Wednesday, September 2, 2020

Abbot: monks are leaving historic Benedictine abbey in ‘very positive spirit’

 

Abbot: monks are leaving historic Benedictine abbey in ‘very positive spirit’

CNA Staff, Sep 1, 2020 / 10:05 am (CNA).- An English Benedictine community’s decision to leave their home for the past two centuries will allow members to focus on core monastic principles, the abbot said Tuesday.

Abbot Nicholas Wetz told CNA Sept. 1 that the monks voted unanimously to move out of Downside Abbey in Stratton-on-the-Fosse, Somerset, but that it was “an incredibly difficult decision.”

“The community spent many months trying to discern what to do and where the Holy Spirit was leading them, and, in the end, took the unanimous decision after much prayer and many, many meetings,” he said.

“There was a deep desire to focus on what was truly important to them as Benedictine monks. While it was a very hard decision, they made it in a very positive spirit because they see it as an opportunity to return to some of those monastic principles.”

Wetz was sent to Downside Abbey two years ago to serve as prior administrator. He was elected abbot Aug. 26 for an eight-year term. His most pressing task is to find a new home for the community, which was established in Somerset in 1814.

The monks’ decision to leave was greeted with dismay because of Downside’s historic role in the revival of English Catholicism. Originally founded in 1606 at Douai, in the Spanish Netherlands, Downside Abbey is the senior Benedictine monastery of the English Benedictine Congregation.

The abbey church, one of only four minor basilicas in England, is a Grade I listed building, a designation reserved for structures of “exceptional interest.” The abbey has a library with around 450,000 items and also houses the archives of the English Benedictine Congregation.

Monks associated with the abbey include Bishop William Ullathorne, a pioneering 19th-century prelate, Bishop Christopher Butler, a Scripture scholar who played a significant role at the Second Vatican Council, and Dom David Knowles, an expert on English monasticism.

But today the community has shrunk to just eight monks.

“The house was designed and built for a community of 50-plus, but that’s a distant memory now. We are facing up to the fact that it’s time for us to downsize,” Wetz said.

Another factor was the end of the long connection between the community and Downside School. The school was run by monks after it was established in Somerset in 1814. But following a scathing report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in 2018, the Charity Commission for England and Wales oversaw the separation of the school and abbey in September 2019.

The abbot said: “Our lives are essentially lives of prayer and saying the Office. That’s very important to us. Being Benedictines, of course we have work. The question is what sort of work, now that the school is no longer part of that responsibility. So we’re looking to see how we can reach out in different ways.”

“The core of everything is our monastic life. That’s got to be central. And I think we were spending so much time worrying about how we were going to run a huge site like this.”

Wetz emphasized that the monks would take care of their responsibilities at Downside.

“We’re not abandoning a place in that sense. We’re going to make sure the church is looked after, and the heritage and everything else. So we’ve got a lot of work to do,” he said.

He added: “We do have concern obviously for our parishioners here and staff and volunteers. Hopefully those relationships will continue in some way. It is a wrench, of course.”

Wetz said that, while no decisions had yet been taken, one option might be for the monks to merge with another Benedictine community.

“As a monk of Belmont Abbey, my own appointment as prior administrator and then as abbot has helped us to see a closer association with other houses of our congregation. This may indicate a good direction for Benedictine life in this country,” he suggested.

Asked what the community might look like at the end of his term as abbot, Wetz replied: “I’d like to think that in eight years’ time the community would certainly be in a new location or another Benedictine community. Yes, it may be a different place, but I hope it would be the same monastic life, seeking God in prayer and work, that they sought when they took their vows. It’s being settled, returning to that stability, that we seek.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


Black leaders blast ‘systemic racism’ of abortion in letter to Planned Parenthood

 

Black leaders blast ‘systemic racism’ of abortion in letter to Planned Parenthood

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Sep 1, 2020 / 10:15 am (CNA).- A coalition of Black leaders is calling out Planned Parenthood for “targeting” Black communities for abortions while professing to support the Black Lives Matter movement.

In a letter to Planned Parenthood’s acting president Alexis McGill-Johnson on Tuesday, more than 100 Black elected officials, pastors, and attorneys demanded that she “confront the systemic racism of America’s abortion practices” and renounce the organization’s founder Margaret Sanger for racist writings.

“This effort demonstrates the outrage among the Black community that we have been strategically and consistently targeted by the abortion industry ever since the practice was legalized almost 50 years ago,” said Human Coalition Action executive director Rev. Dean Nelson, whose organization coordinated the letter.

The letter noted that 36% of abortions in the U.S. are performed on Black women, who represent only 13% of the country’s female population.

“Black women are five times more likely than white women to receive an abortion,” the letter stated. “In some cities, like New York, more Black children are aborted every year than are born alive.”

“This is no accident,” the letter stated, noting that “79 percent of Planned Parenthood’s surgical abortion facilities are located in or near communities of color.”

Several Black state legislators signed the letter, including Louisiana State Sen. Katrina Jackson (D), Texas State Rep. James White (R), and Georgia State Rep. Mack Jackson (D); Indiana’s attorney general Curtis Hill (R) also signed.

Pro-life activists Benjamin Watson and Alveda King signed the letter, along with political strategist Justin Giboney.

Sanger’s legacy has resurfaced amid national protests against racism, and debates over the racial beliefs of American historical figures.

Employees at Planned Parenthood’s New York affiliate in June demanded the removal of CEO Laura McQuade for allegedly ignoring complaints of “systemic racism” within the state organization. McDade eventually left her position.

“Planned Parenthood was founded by a racist, white woman,” the “Save PPGNY” petition for McQuade’s removal stated.

In July, Planned Parenthood of Greater New York announced that its Manhattan facility would no longer bear Sanger’s name, due to her documented support for eugenics. The affiliate’s chair of the board said the act was meant to “acknowledge Planned Parenthood’s contributions to historical reproductive harm within communities of color.”

Sanger did address certain racist organizations, including the Ku Klux Klan, while she promoted birth control.

She also once said that “before eugenicists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for birth control.” She added that eugenicists and birth control advocates are “seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.”

Buzzfeed also recently interviewed more than two dozen employees of Planned Parenthood affiliates and the National Abortion Rights Action League. According to the report, employees of color often felt stuck in lower-level positions and claimed they were boxed out of leadership positions at the organizations.

On Tuesday, the Black leaders wrote to Johnson that “[w]hile Planned Parenthood of Greater New York has disavowed Sanger’s eugenic views, Planned Parenthood National has remained silent.”

“Margaret Sanger wanted to use abortion and contraception to cull minority populations,” the letter stated. “Ms. Johnson, your words about Black Lives Matter ring hollow while your organization perpetuates this racist legacy.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


Trump campaign adds ‘unborn life’ to second term priorities list

 

Trump campaign adds ‘unborn life’ to second term priorities list

CNA Staff, Sep 1, 2020 / 11:00 am (CNA).-

The Trump campaign has added bullet points concerning abortion and religious freedom to its list of second-term priorities, along with points regarding the nomination of federal judges and the Second Amendment.

The points, listed under the heading “Defend American Values,” were not originally part of Trump’s 50-point “core priorities” list, which was published by the campaign Aug. 23. They are believed to have been added over the weekend.

 

 

The priorities added to the list are: “Continue nominating constitutionalist Supreme Court and lower court judges,” “Protect unborn life through every means available,” “Defend the freedoms of religious believers and organizations,” “Support the exercise of Second Amendment rights.”

The president initially faced pushback from some Catholics for omitting mention of abortion and religious liberty from the original list.

Of the original list, pro-life advocate Lila Rose asked on Twitter, “why isn’t a single one the protection of preborn children or stopping the abortion industry from killing 2300 innocent children every day?”

 

Out of @TeamTrump’s 50 “core priorities and goals” why isn’t a single one the protection of preborn children or stopping the abortion industry from killing 2300 innocent children every day? https://t.co/QHxSMjfaec

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) August 24, 2020

 

“President Trump can defund Planned Parenthood by executive order. It’s past time to stop pouring millions of taxpayer dollars into a corporation that slaughters 900 children each day. Defund these atrocities,” Rose added.

 

President Trump can defund Planned Parenthood by executive order. It’s past time to stop pouring millions of taxpayer dollars into a corporation that slaughters 900 children each day. Defund these atrocities!#DefundPlannedParenthood @realDonaldTrump

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) August 26, 2020

 

At the Republican National Convention, several speakers emphasized Trump’s opposition to abortion, including Sr. Dede Byrne, a surgeon and retired Army colonel, who called Trump the “most pro-life president” in U.S. history.

In other contexts, Trump has himself said that he would work to end legal protection for abortion. The president has put a moratorium on federal funding for international aid groups that provide abortions, and pushed back on UN abortion advocacy amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Trump has also called for an end to federal funding for Planned Parenthood, but while the administration has made some moves in that regard, the abortion provider remains the recipient of roughly $500 million annually in Medicaid reimbursement.

Trump’s Democratic opponent in the presidential race, Joe Biden, has pledged to enshrine abortion protections in federal law, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi indicated this week that Congress will end a decades long moratorium on federal funding for abortion if her party retains control of the House of Representatives.

In response to questions from CNA regarding the additional points added to its second term agenda and their original omission, a campaign spokesperson told CNA that Trump “will continue to lay out his second term agenda over the coming weeks, and will be sharing additional details about his plans through policy-focused speeches on the campaign trail.”

 

Ed note: This report has been updated with a response from the Trump campaign.

 


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


UK eyes making at-home medical abortion permissions permanent

 

UK eyes making at-home medical abortion permissions permanent

CNA Staff, Sep 1, 2020 / 12:03 pm (CNA).- A temporary measure allowing UK women up to 10 weeks pregnant to take both abortion pills at home following a tele-conference with a doctor may be extended beyond the end of the coronavirus pandemic.

Ministers are planning a public consultation on whether to make the new rules permanent, according to The Times.

On March 23, the UK’s Department for Health announced that the country’s abortion laws were changing to allow women to complete medical abortions at home in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy, due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Hours later, the department retracted the announcement, which had drawn significant concerns from pro-life groups, who warned that the procedure can have serious and deadly side effects for women.

One week later, on March 30, the government again reversed course, announcing that women would be allowed to receive the pills via mail and perform the full medical abortion at home for the duration of the pandemic.

According to local media, nearly 100,000 at-home abortions have since been carried out under the new rules.

A medical abortion, sometimes called a chemical abortion, is a two-step process that involves the ingestion of mifepristone and misoprostol. Mifepristone effectively starves the unborn baby by blocking the effects of the progesterone hormone, inducing a miscarriage. Misoprostol is taken up to two days later, and induces labor.

The law already permitted women to take the second drug at home, after taking the first at a medical clinic with a face-to-face consultation with a doctor.

The government’s decision to allow women to take both abortion pills at home was initially to be limited to two years or until the end of the coronavirus crisis.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists had been recommending a nationwide expansion of abortion drug accessibility through the use of telemedicine since before the COVID-19 outbreak, most recently in December 2019.

Opponents of the changes have warned that they lack sufficient safeguards for women, such as an ultrasound to confirm the date of the pregnancy, confirmation of a patient’s identity, and screening for warning signs of sexual abuse of minors.

Pro-life groups have also cautioned that the drugs can have serious and even deadly side effects. They pointed to the U.S., where the FDA has recorded 24 deaths of women associated with the drugs, as well as more than 4,000 cases with adverse effects since 2000.

Liz Parsons, director of advocacy for the UK pro-life charity Life, warned that the changes “will make it nearly impossible to discover underlying mental health issues, coercion or abuse, leaving these women without the real help and support they desperately need.”

“It is an absolute disgrace that the abortion lobby should take advantage of the terrible situation we find ourselves in, with Covid-19, to instigate the biggest change to the 1967 Abortion Act we’ve seen in years, without any public consultation,” Parsons said when the changes were announced in March.

Bishop John Sherrington, the English and Welsh bishops’ spokesman on life issues, called the move shocking and said the changes do not prioritize the wellbeing of women.

“[T]hese measures further endanger women who, for example, are rushed into decisions by abusive partners and act without any proper consultation,” he said in March.

“They diminish the seriousness with which these decisions should be taken and the physical and psychological dangers of the administration of these drugs at home.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *