Trump Utters Two Little Letters That Give Ironclad PROOF The Left Has Been Lying About Him
(Hat tip to Front Page's Robert Spencer for noticing this detail)
Democrats and their media presstitutes lick their chops like wolves over every public statement Trump makes, looking for some scant evidence he really IS Hitler reborn.
Of course, we know he’ll never find it. If Larry Arn of Hillsdale College sent students looking into his public statements back in ’16, to see what his likely policy positions might be, he discovered he was very solidly in the limited-government, pro-constitution camp since at least the ’90s.
Dems can pitch their fever-dream visions of Mein Kampf somewhere else. Especially after we all saw how the conducted themselves when a bad case of the sneezles shut down the whole country.
That never stops them from invoking imagery of ‘NAZI’, ‘Fascist’ or ‘Hitler’ at every available opportunity which has the additional benefit of distracting their voters from the fact that card-carrying communists have been quietly, and sometimes not-so quietly, hijacking the Democrat party.
People who spent 4 years not only trampling the Constitution, but refusing to honor their oaths to apply the law (even ‘tabling’ impeachment proceedings against Mayorkas because they didn’t want his refusal to defend the border to become a national conversation before the ’24 election.
It didn’t take more than a couple of months to expose that 4 years of border chaos was no mere ‘mistake’, but a deliberate policy decision by a party who thought it would help them in some way.
Now that Trump is enforcing the border, locating people who ought not be here, and sending them packing, besides prosecuting the key lawbreakers who make cities unsafe to live in, and obliterating the incoming drug boats that have (among other things) served as part of China’s revenge on the West for indignities not forgotten from the Opium Wars back in the 1800s. (This explains why fentanyl precursors can be traced back to China. How fitting to have the drug that weakened and demoralized them be used in the same way against the West?)
Fast forward to this past week where Americans are finally realizing the scale of the fraud being perpetrated against US taxpayers by communities of former Somali refugees in Minnesota. We’re talking billions of dollars that were supposedly helping the destitute, hungry, and infirm among us get food, housing, and medical care.
Instead, it funded luxury purchases and (worse!) jihadi terror groups in Somalia. It gets worse. Some of those implicated have direct ties to Ilhan Omar’s political campaign, which only goes to substantiate public statements in her native tongue in which she claimed to prioritize Somalia’s interests. (To many casual observer, such an attitude seems like something that might disqualify a candidate from government office.)
This brings us to the statement by Trump that made the left freak out, but (as the Front Page article ‘Trump Destroys the Left’s Entire Case Against Him‘ explains), the very statement they are freaking out about is the one that proves they’re lying about every last ‘threat to democracy’ accusation they make up about him.
“If we have criminals that came into our country, and they were naturalized maybe through Biden or somebody that didn’t know what they were doing, if I have the power to do it… I would denaturalize, absolutely!” —JustTheNews
Even in this video, Trump leaves room for uncertainty. ‘We’ll see’ is the language of someone who will assert his powers within the Constitution and let those policies be hashed out in court… as opposed to, say, someone boasting about a ‘pen and a phone’ who will take action beyond the scope of his powers even if Congress refuses to do what he wants them to.
As any native English speaker will know, ‘If’ does some heavy lifting.
For example, in the sentence ‘if you fail to make your car payments, the bank can take your car back” also carries with it the assurance that the bank has no lawful power to repo a car whose payments have been made. If the bank comes for your car anyway, they’ll soon find themselves on the wrong side of a lawsuit.
Now look back at Trump’s sentence. ‘If I have the power to do it’… is every bit as conditional as the car loan example. It implies that he will sit down with legal counsel, examine the extent of his powers under the Constitution, as well as the DOJ’s options under the law as it has been written — the very law that Biden/Kamala/Garland/Mayorkas played so fast and loose with — to see which statutes might be used (if any) to accomplish this task.
There’s a reason so many of Biden’s initiatives have been shut down by the courts, and why Trump — once it has risen to appeals — has had so many of his hold up under the law.
Only one of those Presidents was lawless and rogue… and it’s NOT the one the Presstitutes from the Media(D) like to claim it is.
HINT: It’s the guy who heard what SCOTUS instructed him about, for example, Eviction Moratoriums or Student Debt and did whatever the hell he wanted anyway.
Posts
