- By Susanne Posel – February 17, 2015
0 Comment
CIA, climate change, geoengineering, global warming
Susanne Posel ,Chief Editor Occupy Corporatism | The US IndependentFebruary 17, 2015
Lauren Casey, professor at Rutgers University is claiming that her friend Alan Robock, former climatologist, said that he was contacted by an unnamed person asserting they were a “consultant” to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) contacted him regarding weaponized weather.
Robock’s alleged statement came during an argument between him and Casey over “the use of geoengineering to combat climate change”.
The former climatologist made the CIA contact claim during a discussion at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
Robok said that the caller was a contractor for the CIA and asked him “if we control someone else’s climate, would they then know about it?”
Before the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) was decommissioned, this experiment was capable of producing torrential rain storms and horrendous drought, earthquakes, tsunamis and most other “natural” disasters seen periodically as a normal geological and bio-spherical pattern.
In 1998, Bernard Eastlund, contractor for the European Space Agency (ESA), wrote a paper on how to knock out tornadoes using HAARP instruments on the ground. That paper was peer-reviewed and presented in Italy and it was widely accepted.
Nine years later, Aledia Centeno Rodriquez, speaker at the UN General Assembly on Decolonization (UNGAD) mentioned the use of an “ionospheric heater” used by the Arecibo National Astronomy and Ionospheric Center (NAIC) in conjunction with HAARP, which has a patent filed in the US mentioning the experiment’s ability to conduct ionospheric manipulation.
According to the patent , HAARP can also function as an anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense system, permit interception and disruption of communications, [disruption of] weather and submarine and subterranean communications, among other things.
HAARP is capable of being able to “simulate and perform the same function as performed by the detonation of a heavy type nuclear device”.
The US government has been looking into the possibility of connections between changing weather and war over resources.
In 2012, the National Research Council (NRC) announced they are conducting a study that will analyze and evaluate “evaluate the evidence on possible connections between climate change and U.S. national security concerns and to identify ways to increase the ability of the intelligence community to take climate change into account in assessing political and social stresses with implications for U.S. national security.”
The NRC, initiated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) released a report entitled “Climate and Social Stress: Implications for Security Analysis” explains that extreme weather frequency is expected to increase and that this environmental shift is viewed as a disruption to be planned for.
The summation is that knowledge of climate change and its possible extremes could assist the intelligence community in mitigating damage to operational missions. And since it is the consensus of eco-fascists that man is the cause of climate change, the matter is best settled if there were educational directions concerning national security with regard to global warming.
According to the report: “Tropical storms and the increased storm surges that result from sea-level rise and, in some cases, land subsidence can disrupt production, refining and transport of petroleum. In addition, because offshore oil and gas platforms are generally not designed to accommodate a permanent rise in mean sea level, climate-related sea-level rise would disrupt production.”
The totality of analysis for national security encompasses climate science, political issues and social science which is viewed as “an important need is to integrate the social science of natural disasters and disaster response with other forms of analysis. This body of knowledge is particularly important for assessing the security consequences of climate change because disruptive climate events will typically be perceived and responded to as natural disasters.”
The report explains: “The intelligence community presumably already uses an analogous process to consider the ability of foreign governments and societies to withstand various kinds of social and political stresses. The results of stress tests would inform national security decision makers about places that are at risk of becoming security concerns as a result of climate events and could be used by the U.S. government or international aid agencies to target high-risk places for efforts to reduce susceptibilities or to improve coping, response and recovery capacities.”
Another report entitled “National Security and the Threat of Climate Change” is an assessment of climate change’s impact on national security and the mounting threats identified by CNA.
This report asserts that climate change is a definitive threat to national security because it “acts as a threat multiplier for instability in some of the most volatile regions of the world.” By adding tensions to citizens of even developed countries, the possibility of being cut off from energy sources, necessities and protection is a concern of the US military.
The suggested solution is a commitment “to a stronger national and international role to help stabilize climate changes at levels that will avoid significant disruption to global security and stability.”
What's Trending Online
X
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at info@content.ad.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at info@content.ad.
Posts
