Slate’s Islamic apologist Aymann Ismail on Antifa attack on Andy Ngo: “This is bad, but he’s guilty of worse”
This is reprehensible. I really, really hate much of what @MrAndyNgo believes. But you don’t physically attack a person because of their views. You don’t defend a violent mob attacking a person who is alone. This is wrong and disgusting and shameful. twitter.com/stillgray/stat…
I’d argue what the fear mongering he’s done against Muslims plus the work he’s done to discredit hate crimes, helped create an atmosphere of violence that vulnerable people all have to live through just for being who they are. This is bad, but he’s guilty of worse.
2,831 people are talking about this
Both the Left and Islamic apologists today minimize, dismiss, or outright deny the violence of jihad terrorists and Leftist neo-Brownshirts, while claiming that the words of those whom they hate are tantamount to violence.
On that basis, they are moving to silence all criticism of jihad mass murder and Sharia oppression, and all opposition to the Leftist agenda, as “hate speech.”
Note also that Aymann Ismail is referring to Ngo’s work exposing fake hate crimes as one of the justifications for attacking him with concrete milkshakes.
And Slate gives this malignant fascist a platform.
Dangerous times are ahead.
Posts
