CNN Calls Out Crockett For Claiming Epstein Funded Republicans… Do You Buy Her Excuse?
Crockett is almost making Jen Psaki look like a straight shooter by comparison
The ‘wedge issue’ they thought would fracture the GOP has left Dems stepping on rakes ever since they started releasing ‘damaging’ emails.
Deep in the stack of however many tens of thousands of documents that will eventually be available to the pubic, Democrats tried to deep-six Trump with about three of them.
The most ‘damning’ of them has shown to be fraudulently redacted by Democrats to make a guilt-by-association accusation that had never been made against the President. When it turned out that the redacted name was a victim whose name we all know, and said Trump had never been in any way unprofessional with her, they dropped that issue and moved on to … whatever was next.
With Hakeem Jeffries looking for money (and a meeting!) with Jeffrey Epstein, while being touted as ‘Brooklyn’s Barack’, and Plaskett exchanging texts with him in real time as she prepared to question Trump’s disgraced ex-lawyer Michael Cohen for Congressional hearings, she was asking his guidance and for him to clarify information she did in fact use in the questioning… and received praise for her questions after the fact, Dems have had to regroup.
Never one to be encumbered by inconvenient impediments like the truth, Crockett went to the floor to accuse the GOP of taking money from Epstein, too.
(A classic muddy-the-waters gaslighting tactic. If your accuser calls you out on something he himself is doing, he is a hypocrite, and ultimately worse than the one he is accusing.)
Epstein was a Democrat down to the core of his being. Nothing about his political history has anyone suggesting he’s the kind of guy who would be rubbing shoulders (or anything else) with the Republican political class, let alone sending them cash.
But Crockett went to the floor of the House talking about all sorts of people who got money from Jeffrey Epstein. (Sure, maybe it’s not THE Jeffrey Epstein. Maybe it’s a whole other guy, and sometimes even years after he had croaked, but why let such little details give you any pause/)
You know your lies are getting pretty rough when even Kaitlin Collins is calling you out on them live on CNN. Crockett knew it was coming and came ready to spin it and spin it hard, claiming on a technicality that she didn’t lie… exactly.
Kaitlan Collins even posted Zeldin’s reply during the segment:
If she really wanted to expose Crockett’s dishonest intent, CNN ought to have posted this one, too:
Question is…
Did she already know she was lying when she gave herself an ‘out’ by using lawyerspeak wiggle words on the floor?
Or is she retconning history as she gaslights us all about her ‘innocent mistake’ of putting the idea in the heads of votes that both sides were on the take from the Pedophile billionaire who routinely frequented the Clinton White House.
Posts
