STRANGE TIMING: Critics Are Connecting Dots Between DC Shooting And Seditious Six Rhetoric
Have we seen enough leftwing conspriacies to at least demand some answers?
Each individual data point on its own could be dismissed as merely ‘coincidence’. But there is a threshold beyond which ‘coincidence’ is no longer a credible explanation. Are we there yet? Some say yes.
Learning hard lessons from past left-wing civic sabotage
We need look no further than Crossfire Hurricane, or Media Matters: War Plan 2017, or the orchestrated action between J6 Committee, Biden’s White House, Jack Smith and the various attempts to criminalize Donald Trump to understand that Dems can and will orchestrate a ‘movement’ to destroy or discredit any enemy that threatens its power base.
The unhinged response to the Dobbs decision — refusal to enforce laws protecting judges in their homes from illegal protest, and refusal to charge the ‘Janes Revenge’ domestic terror attacks on churches and pro-life clinics showed willingness to leverage illegal activities for their goals.
It could be argued that BLM, Antifa, and the highly-orchestrated and well-funded Pelestine protests served the same purpose that ‘No Kings’ and ‘Anti-Ice’ protests serve today — to energize the radical left and give them a permission structure to harass political enemies.
The case is being made by a growing number of voices — some even bringing literal receipts — that this is part of a Color Party Revolution being orchestrated against the American people by bad actors within their own government together wth NGO proxies with familiar names all supposedly acting in the name of philanthropy or democracy… while ratcheting power more and more into a one-party state. That one party just happens to be the one currently undergoing a hostile takeover by its own extreme left flank.
Was the DC terror shooting provoked?
Guest hosting for Mark Levin, Ben Ferguson points to the rising animus that has been targeting and demonizing federal agents tasked with something as innocuous as enforcing laws passed by Congress many years ago.
Even ICE spokesmen will tell their critics, if you dislike how we enforce the laws, make changes to the laws, and we will enforce those.
ICE has routinely been targeted with violence, has been doxxed, and has even had bounties placed on its members’ heads by (no surprise here) foreign criminal cartels.
More recently, with the National Guard being called in both to quell the rent-a-crowd riots the left gins up to contest Trump’s policies, to protect Federal Agents doing their jobs, and to help make streets safer in cities like the District of Columbia, we see the rhetoric against them stepping up.
The ‘Seditious Six’ are at the center of controversy. They might (arguably) be deliberately throwing wrenches in the chain of command, creating a culture where those in uniform might (a) hesitate before following an order; (b) defy one openly; or (c) undermine it with incomplete obedience, feigned misunderstandings, deliberate delays, and the like.
Six short days before this shooting, we had former CIA spook Senator Slotkin make a direct reference to the National Guard potentially ‘shooting civilians’. Obviously, that’s a further escalation of the ‘threat to democracy’ and ‘Nazi’/’Authoritarian’ rhetoric we’ve been hearing from the left for years now.
Even in reporting on the shooting, as the details were still filtering out, MSNOW astonishingly made excuses for the crime. They went as far as laying potential blame on the National Guard and the ‘controversy’ of ‘ICE’, before defaulting to the passive voice of ‘this shooting has happened’, as if the ambush attempt at murder was not a deliberate decision by a malevolent actor.
We are seeing billboards paid by organized groups making undisguised calls for subversion and questioning of lawful orders.
How many data points to we need to see there is an organized attempt to no only undermine Trump’s agenda of deporting people who are not here lawfully, but to create dissent in the military itself?
Bryan Dean Wright, a former CIA operator, addressed this topic on his Nov 24 podcast, mentioning two countries (Pakistan and Egypt) where a culture of military insubordination encouraged by political actors led to the military (Egypt) or Intel Agency (Pakistan) breaking free of civilian contraints to take control of the country themselves.
His concern is that Slotkin and Co are feeding that beast with consequences we will not know until it’s too late to unwind them. (The reader might note that Brennan’s abuses are already a matter of public record, not just his sabotage of Trump, but how he spied on Congress for Obama as well.)
Ferguson’s concern takes a different form: that these public statements aren’t just an attempt to demoralize the military, but it is serving as a dog-whistle to identify the National Guard and put them on an ‘enemies list’.
Once the call goes out that they are to be demonized, doxxed, and attacked just like ICE is, the agitators who have been serving as the de facto brownshirt militant extreme left wing of the Democrat party will know what to do.
It seems as if they may have already gotten that message.
Leftwing agitators of the sort mentioned above openly cheered the attempted murder of these two Americans by a jihadi.
Elected Dems, for their part, are already explicitly threatening the Pentagon with retribution for any steps they take of looking into whether the Seditious Six have violated legal statutes.
How loud do you think the “obstruction of justice’ cries would be if the shoe were on the other foot?
If you can create a culture where enough people buy the lie of ‘illegal orders’, then Democrats can ride in on their white horses this November and ‘save democracy’ from the ‘bad orange man’.
Even if they have to ‘break a few eggs’ to make that happen. But what do they care, so long as they get their precious political power back.
Posts
