Regarding this last verse, the one that discusses the hardening of Pharaoh’s heart, we find the following illuminating homiletic tale in the Yalkut Shimoni on this week’s Torah portion (Yalkut 182:2): A lion and a variety of animals, including a fox, were on a ship. The ship comes to a toll where a donkey was the dock master in charge of collecting the taxes from all the vessels. The donkey demands that the lion’s ship pay the toll as well. The fox protests, “What impudence! Do you not see that the king of all the animals is among us! How dare you ask us to pay the toll?” The donkey retorts defiantly, “I am only collecting the tax to bring it to the king’s treasury!” He insists on it being paid. At this point, the lion asks that the ship be brought closer to the dock. He then leaps from the ship and kills the donkey. He throws the carcass of the donkey to the fox and asks him to carve it up into pieces. The fox does so, but upon seeing the heart of the donkey he gobbles it up. The lion comes to see how the fox carved up the donkey and sees that the heart is missing. “Where is this fool’s heart?” asks the lion. The fox replies, “My master the king, if this donkey would have had a heart would he have demanded that the king pay the toll?” So too, says this midrash, if Pharaoh would have had a heart, he would not have defied the Almighty, the King of all kings, and refused to free the Jewish nation. The heart is generally understood to be the seat of the trait of understanding. In fact, when King Solomon ascends the throne, he doesn’t ask God for long life or monetary wealth. Instead, he prays, “Therefore give your servant an understanding heart to judge your people, that I may discern between good and bad […]” (I Kings 3:9). The midrash concludes that Pharaoh is the donkey, and ultimately he gets punished for defying the sovereignty of the Almighty. But this midrash is difficult to understand. The Talmud (Sukkah 30a) relates a similar instance of a king coming to toll. A king was traveling in his kingdom and came to a toll road. He ordered his servants to pay the toll. The servants asked him, “Why are you paying the tax when all the proceeds from tolls belong to you anyway?” The king responded that if someone sees him not paying the toll others might learn from him that it is acceptable not to pay it. Therefore, he wanted to pay it. In this instance the king makes it clear that the right thing to do is to pay the toll; it even seems necessary that the king pay the toll. Why then, in our midrash did the lion kill the donkey for his impertinence? As mentioned, most disputes are about control. The Talmud is saying that, of course, the king can decide if he wants to pay the toll. If he has a valid reason to pay the tax he will do so because he can do whatever he wants. The midrash in Yalkut Shimoni, however, faults the donkey for trying to control the interaction with the king of the animals. He is trying to exert his own control by saying that he has to collect the tax in order to give it back to the king. The fact that he has the impudence to demand the tax from the king means that he doesn’t really submit to the fact that the king is the one to decide whether or not he wants to pay the tax. The donkey wants to be in control. For that, he deserves to be put to death. The same is true for Pharaoh. Even though he somewhat acknowledges that he has to submit to the will of God, he constantly tries to control the circumstances by placing conditions on how the Jewish people are to serve God. Of course, by trying to exert his own influence he demonstrated that he isn’t really submitting to the will of the Almighty. Just as the donkey who tried to exert control by forcing the king to remit his own taxes paid for his impudence with his life, so too Pharaoh brought destruction upon himself and his country. Maintaining mutual respect and open communication forms the bedrock to sidestep control issues in relationships. Embrace and employ compromise; finding a middle ground ensures that both voices are heard. Learning to appreciate individual growth and interests can nurture a feeling of independence within the relationship. Avoid power struggles by valuing other’s perspectives and decisions. Cultivate empathy – understanding another person’s needs and emotions often deters one’s personal need for control, and reinforces the foundation of a healthy, control-free relationship. |