Acharei Mot (Leviticus 16 - 18) GOOD MORNING! This upcoming Monday, May 6th, is known as Yom HaShoah – Holocaust Remembrance Day. Given the tragedies of earlier this year, and more recently the serious events of the past few weeks, Yom HaShoah has more poignancy this year than others in recent memory. We just celebrated Passover and the seder meals, and millions of Jews the world over read the following words in the Haggadah, “In every generation (nations) rise up against us to annihilate us” and yet they do not succeed in wiping us out. Why? As the Haggadah concludes that paragraph “for the Holy One Blessed be He rescues us from their hand.” But there is one important and remarkable thing that they have failed to destroy over millennia of Jewish suffering: the humanity of the Jewish people. The recent Iranian attacks on Israel were widely celebrated in both Iran and in Gaza – with residents joyously flooding the streets. Who can forget the festivity displayed on the streets of Gaza after 9-11 or the horrific events of October 7th? But I have never seen such celebrations in Israel over civilian casualties. At the end of the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC there is a little amphitheater playing short video clips. In one, a man relates that while in a death camp he saw his friend praying at a time that was too late for the morning service and too early for the afternoon service. He asked his friend what he was praying. The friend responded, “I am thanking God.” “For what?” inquired the man, “Look around you, we are surrounded by death and starvation! What do you have to be thankful for?” His friend replied, “I am thanking God that I am one of us and not one of them!” The source of this moral compass inherently present within the Jewish people is the Torah. This week’s Torah reading highlights this very clearly, and in fact, a portion of this week’s reading is part of the afternoon service on Yom Kippur – the holiest day on the Jewish calendar. In introducing a whole litany of morally perverse acts that are prohibited, the Torah begins: “Speak to the Israelites and say to them, I am God. Do not follow in the ways of Egypt where you lived, nor of Canaan where I will be bringing you; do not follow their customs” (Leviticus 18:2-3). The newly minted Jewish nation is being given its own code of ethics and mores to live by. They are forewarned not to descend morally to the levels of the nations that are around them, and to not capitulate to their own baser desires. The Torah ends this introduction with a rather odd statement: “You shall observe my laws and decrees, which a man shall fulfill and live by them. I am God” (Ibid 18:4). The great medieval biblical commentator known as Rashi makes an equally enigmatic statement on the words “live by them.” Rashi says, “This refers to the World to Come, for if you say that this refers to this world – how can that be? After all man is destined to die!” The real problem with Rashi’s comment is that the Talmud uses this verse for an interpretation that is, on the face of it, exactly the opposite of what Rashi seems to be saying. According to the Talmud (Yoma 85b) with a few exceptions, one may violate any of the commandments of the Torah to save a life. This is because there is value in life right now. But Rashi seems to be saying that life on this “mortal coil” is essentially meaningless because everyone is destined to die and that the only “real” life is that of the World to Come. In fact, according to Rashi one may even argue that it is better to let a person perish so that he can get to the “real” life of the World to Come more quickly! Mankind is preoccupied with death; either obsessed with actively evading it or obsessed with actively trying to avoid thinking about it. But at some point in our lives we must come to terms with it. A person is called a mortal (from the Latin mortalis – subject to death) because from the day we are born we are all in the process of dying. (The word “murder” comes from the same root.) The Talmud (Bava Kama 26b) has a fascinating discussion regarding certain laws of property damage that, quite remarkably, also has far-reaching philosophical implications. Imagine the following scenario; an unhappy couple are arguing in their penthouse apartment on the 18th floor. In frustration the husband picks up his wife’s much beloved, and quite expensive, Chihuly vase and angrily flings it off the balcony. Meanwhile, on the street below a person sees this vase hurtling toward the sidewalk and he decides to smash it with a heavy 2x4 that he’s holding, prior to it actually hitting the sidewalk. |