2 Iowa Cops Murdered in 'Ambush Attacks'

“There's somebody out there shooting police. There is a clear and present danger to police officers right now.”

11.2.2016 

 

News

 

 Truth Revolt 

 

26

11

Two Iowa police officers were murdered in their squad cars early Wednesday morning in what authorities are calling ambush attacks.

According to Fox News, the shootings came near Des Moines and occurred just 25 minutes apart, said Des Moines police Sgt. Paul Parizek. The two unidentified officers, a Des Moines cop and one from the suburb of Urbandale, were found in their bullet-riddled cruisers.

“In all appearances it looks just like that, that these officers were ambushed,” Parizek said. “It doesn't look like there was any interaction between these cowards and the officers they shot in their cars.”

The shootings appear to be the latest cases of police officers being targeted for assassination in a year that has seen 111 police officers killed in the line of duty, including 50 by gunfire, said Fox News:

Some of the shootings have been connected to anti-police sentiment sparked by racially charged incidents involving alleged brutality or improper use of deadly force around the country.

There was no information immediately available about witness accounts, how many shots were fired or whether police know who they are looking for.

Des Moines police said in a news release earlier that officers responded to a report of shots fired at the intersection of 70th Street and Aurora Avenue at 1:06 a.m., and the first officers to arrive on scene found an Urbandale officer dying of gunshot wounds.

Des Moines police officers responded to assist and just 20 minutes later, a Des Moines officer was found fatally shot at an intersection about two blocks away.

“There's somebody out there shooting police. There is a clear and present danger to police officers right now,” Parizek said.

The Des Moines police officer is believed to be the first from the city to be shot and killed on duty since 1977. The Urbandale officer is believed to be that department's first to be shot dead in the line of duty.

Iran Ambassador Tells UN 'Israeli Occupation' is ‘Most Destabilizing Threat to Intl Security’ Israel, not Iran. Got it.

Iran Ambassador Tells UN 'Israeli Occupation' is ‘Most Destabilizing Threat to Intl Security’

Israel, not Iran. Got it.

11.2.2016 

 

News

 

 Mark Tapson 

 

16

51

Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations declared that the "abhorrent Israeli regime occupation" is "the most destabilizing threat to international peace and security."

According to the Mehr News Agency, Iran’s Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Gholamhossein Dehghani, addressed the Special Political and Decolonization Committee on a document with the unwieldy title, “Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories” at the 71st General Assembly Tuesday.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran is seriously concerned," he began "about the disturbing findings" of the aforementioned report, and complained that "the Special Committee was once again prevented by the Israeli regime to gain access to the occupied territories to meet with victims within its mandate."

The representative of the abhorrent Islamic regime that is actually the most destabilizing threat to international peace andsecurity" went on to list the predictable litany of Israel's purported offenses:

We are concerned about the worsening human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, in particular, the escalation of violence against the people in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the ongoing dire humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip due to continued blockade and economic embargo, the destructive impact of successive military aggressions and other inhumane acts such as frequent military raids, including raids on homes and school premises during classroom hours, exploitation of the natural resources of Palestine by the Israeli regime, which deliberately denies Palestinians right to permanent sovereignty over their natural resources and their right to development. 

He then put forth the Iranian regime's demands that "the illegal land and sea blockade of Gaza... must be lifted and all crossing points must be opened promptly and unconditionally. Further in this regard, all practices that amount to collective punishment, including restrictions on freedom of movement across the Occupied Palestinian Territory, demolitions of homes, residency revocations, cutting of benefits, closures of towns and delays in returning bodies for burial should be ended."

No mention of the fact that not one of these measures would be in place if the so-called Palestinian people ended terrorism against Israeli Jews and lived in peace with them. No mention of the fact that the responsibility for ending all this lies entirely with the Palestinian leadership. No mention of the fact that the Iranian terror group Hezbollah is active in the Palestinian Territories and fomenting violence.

Gholamhossein Dehghani went on to accuse Israel of violating "a range of human rights which amounts to war crime in accordance with international humanitarian law... We believe that It is long overdue to end this abhorrent Israeli regime occupation, which has brought so much sufferings and pains to the Palestinian people, and continues to be the most destabilizing factor that clearly threatens international peace and security."

You have to hand it to the Iranian regime -- it has a lot of chutzpah pretending to take on the role of human rights defender.

Former DNC Chair: Clinton Wrong for Attacking Comey I certainly wouldn't do it.

Former DNC Chair: Clinton Wrong for Attacking Comey

I certainly wouldn't do it.

11.2.2016 

 

News

 

 Tiffany Gabbay 

 

9

17

While the Democratic attack apparatus has FBI Director James Comey in its crosshairs, former DNC chairman Ed Rendell thinks attacking the Bureau chief is a mistake. 

The former Pennsylvania governor told radio host Rich Zeoli on Tuesday that the Clinton campaign's decision to attack Comey over his decision to reopen the Hillary Clinton email investigation is poorly advised.  

"I wouldn't do that," Rendell said. "Again, you know, I'm not running the campaign by any means, but I wouldn't do that." Rendell said he "agreed" with the host when he said that attacking Comey is  a "mistake."

"I generally do [think that it's a mistake] as well," Rendell added before stating that Comey's revelation will certainly help voter turnout for Trump:\

"I think the FBI stuff gave a boost to Trump, not because it changed anyone's mind but because I think it took a couple of Trump voters who were pretty discouraged last week with all the news about the polls and stuff and probably weren't gonna vote and now they're on fire and they're gonna vote, so I anticipate, as I said last week, but I even anticipate it more so that it's gonna be a close election here in Pennsylvania."

Interestingly, Rendell also mentioned that public transport workers striking in Philadelphia could suppress Democratic voter turnout on Election Day. Of course, the Pennsylvania Democrat had to find a silver lining somewhere, and fantasized that as more information comes out about how the FBI decided to go public with this information, "the better it is for Secretary Clinton."

Keep dreamin', Ed. The FBI also just released 15-year-old documents pertaining to Bill Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich that highlight the probe into Clinton corruption. Contrary to what Rendell believes, as more information comes out it will only reinforce the perception that the Clintons have been neck-deep in scandals, corruption and other malfeasance for decades running. 

Another Surprise for Hillary! FBI Releases Files on Bill Clinton's 2001 Pardon of Marc Rich

It reminds voters that Clinton "corruption" spans decades.

11.2.2016 

 

News

 

 Tiffany Gabbay 

 

5

33

On Tuesday, a rarely-used FBI Twitter account announced that published on its website, and available for public consumption, is 129 pages of documents pertaining to Bill Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich. 

The FBI claims that it did not release the documents out of political motivation; rather, they were simply responding to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. 

To refresh your memory, Marc Rich was the fugitive Democrat donor wanted for tax evasion. His ex-wife Denise Eisenberg Rich donated to the Clinton Foundation, Bill Clinton's Presidential Foundation, and Hillary Clinton's senate campaign as well. 

It reminds voters of how money can buy you anything when you're paying off a Clinton. The Washington Post must have been pained to report on the Rich saga and new information-release thusly: 

Rich, who received his pardon on Bill Clinton’s last day in the White House, had fled to Switzerland after learning he would be indicted on a charge of tax evasion in the 1980s. The investigation, conducted between 2001 and 2005, was disclosed in news accounts at the time and looked at whether Clinton had issued the pardon in exchange for political donations, including to Hillary Clinton’s 2000 Senate race and to the Clinton Foundation. It was closed with no charges.

Actually the FBI files read that Denise Eisenberg Rich "has been a major political donor to the Democratic Party, and these donations may have been intended to influence the fugitive's pardon."

The Post conceded that the newly released FBI documents are a "seemingly random reminder of one of the darkest chapters of the Clinton presidency":

Democrats have, of course, scrambled in anger, stating that the FBI's release is further proof they are meddling in the 2016 election. The FBI has remained calm, cool and collected in its response, which the Post sums up:

FBI officials said the timing was coincidental. The FBI released a statement saying that they were published after Freedom of Information Act requests and were posted “automatically and electronically to the FBI’s public reading room in accordance with the law and established procedures.” This happens, the statement said, on a “first-in, first-out” basis.

The Rich documents provided little new information about the matter, which plagued the first years of Bill Clinton’s post-presidency. But they served as a reminder of the vigor of the criminal probe into the matter.

While there may not be anything new or remarkable in the FBI documents, what should stand out to voters is how the Bureau internally referred to the Clinton-Rich investigation as "concerning possible public corruption surrounding the pardons granted by former president William Clinton."

How About That Temperament? Hillary Lashes Out at Bill Clinton 'Rapist' Protester at Rally We thought she was steady as a rock...

How About That Temperament? Hillary Lashes Out at Bill Clinton 'Rapist' Protester at Rally

We thought she was steady as a rock...

11.2.2016 

 

News

 

 Tiffany Gabbay 

 

17

35

We keep hearing from Democrats how calm and collected Hillary Clinton is under pressure. How her temperament is steady. How she is slow to anger. This is all meant, in Democrats' minds, to draw a distinction between their candidate and Donald Trump, whom they paint as unstable and emotionally volatile. 

Consider the following footage, however, of a campaign rally in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on Tuesday. A heckler present at the rally accused Bill Clinton of being a rapist. Rather than "go high," Hillary instead lashed out at a protester, who was ultimately led out of the rally. The audio makes it difficult to discern what Clinton says to the protester, but The AmericanMirror was able to decipher her words:

As Clinton spoke, the protester shouted, “Bill Clinton is a rapist!” as the audience began to boo.

Hillary’s demeanor changed almost instantly and she became angry at the protester, screaming at him.

“You know, I am sick and tired of the negative, dark, divisive vision from people who support Donald Trump,” she shouted before she was drowned out by the crowd.

“We are not going backwards, we are going forwards!” she yelled, continuing to point at the protester.

The Mirror astutely notes that Clinton did not bother to defend her husband while she was lashing out at the protester. 

The blog also provides video that's been circulating on Twitter of the protester being removed from the audience: 

Finally! Now Let's Focus on Why Hillary Approved Sale Of At Least 20% of Our Uranium to Russia

But tell us again how Trump is in cahoots with Putin....

11.2.2016 

 

News

 

 Tiffany Gabbay 

 

6

2511

Democrats, led by the Clinton campaign, have doubled -- even tripled-down -- on peddling the Trump-Putin-Russia conspiracy theory in order to deflect attention away from Hillary Clinton's myriad transgressions -- not least of which is the fact that it is she who has more dubious ties to Russia than anyone else. 

For some reason, even too many Republicans have been reticent about the UraniumOne deal, which ultimately saw then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton approve the sale of 20 percent (and slated to grow to 50 percent) of our nation's uranium production to Russia. 

During a recent Special Report, Bret Baier interviewed  New York Times reporter Jo Becker, who actually first broke the story about how the Clintons, through mega-donor Frank Giustra, played a role in selling-out our nation's uranium production to the Russia-owned firm, UraniumOne. 

The video report featured above explains how Frank Giustra, a close friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton, was interested in purchasing uranium mines in Kazakhstan. In order to help his friend, Bill met with the country's president and publicly praised his record on human rights (a joke considering this is Kazakhstan). In return for Bill's PR-plug,  Kazakhstan approved the sale of uranium mines to Giustra, who in turn turned an "worthless shell company" into a lucrative one. Giustra in return donated $31 million to the Clinton foundation and pledged $100 million more. 

In 2007, Giustra's company merged with a company dubbed UraiumOne, which went on a "buying spree" of uranium stores in the U.S. Well, UraiumOne was then bought out by the Russian government. 

The key here is that this deal required the approval of the Secretary of State. There are many different ties that go deep and link directly to the Clintons, who did not disclose the hefty donations from Giustra nor their affilations with UraniumOne, to  the State Department (even though they were required by law to do so). 

Peter Schweizer, author of the book, Clinton Cash, also makes an appearance to discuss the findings of his investigation. It was refreshing to see a reporter with the New York Times display journalistic integrity, and Jo Becker certainly does that here in the interview, as she did when she first reported the story. 

The video segment above is well worth watching and sharing, as I believe this is one of the most underreported stories in this entire election season.