Sunday, March 1, 2020

Amy Klobuchar Defends Blocking Late-Term Abortion Ban: I Stand Behind Abortions Up to Birth (Have you become Drunken With The Blood Of The Saints? Yes I find I must Declare It Is So.)

 NATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   FEB 28, 2020   |   11:22AM    WASHINGTON, DC
Amy Klobuchar does not think late-term, pain-capable unborn babies deserve protection under the law.
On Thursday during a Fox News town hall, the Democrat presidential candidate said she opposes the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would prohibit abortions after 20 weeks when strong scientific evidence indicates unborn babies can feel pain, Fox News reports.
Klobuchar, a Minnesota senator, did not vote on the bill Tuesday in the U.S. Senate because she was campaigning, but “I would have voted with the Democrats,” she told Fox.
Despite strong public support for the legislation, Democrats blocked it from passing the Senate. Republicans do not have 60 votes in the chamber to overcome Democrats’ filibuster. The vote came after the White House indicated President Donald Trump would sign the bill into law.
Klobuchar said if she defeats Trump, she would work to ensure late-term abortions remain legal even if Roe v. Wade is overturned.
“I am strongly pro-choice, I always have been,” she said. “I would work with Congress to actually try to codify Roe v. Wade into law.”
When host Martha MacCallum asked her when life begins, Klobuchar refused to say.
Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures and videos.
“I follow Roe v. Wade,” she replied, “and what Roe v. Wade allows for is the protection of a woman’s decision to make a decision about her own life, and of course by the third trimester there is some limits on that.”
MacCallum responded by pointing out that American abortion laws are radical compared to most other countries, the U.S. being one of only seven countries that allows elective abortions after 20 weeks.
Klobuchar replied by defending late-term abortions again, saying, “I think the vast majority of Americans support Roe v. Wade.”
Actually, most Americans do not support Roe when they understand its full extent. Klobuchar’s views on abortion are radical and out of touch with most Americans. Her pro-abortion voting record includes opposing a bill to protect newborns from infanticide.
In December, she told Cosmopolitan that she would work to make abortion on demand an “American right” if elected president. She also would force taxpayers to fund the billion-dollar abortion industry.
In contrast, most Americans support strong limits on abortion and oppose taxpayer-funded abortions. Two recent polls show strong public opposition to abortion on demand.
A June Gallup poll also found that 60 percent of Americans want all (21%) or almost all (39%) abortions made illegal. In contrast, 38 percent said they want all (25%) or almost all (13%) abortions legal. Similarly, a Harvard CAPS/Harris poll found that just 6% of Americans said abortions should be allowed “up until the birth of the child.”

Elizabeth Warren: It’s Too “Radical and Restrictive” to Stop Killing Babies in Late-Term Abortions (Just how Dark & Evil has your Heart become Elizabeth Warren. Do you enjoy the Taste of Blood, The Blood of The UN-Born in your Mouth for Educing such Evils.)

 OPINION   KRISTAN HAWKINS   FEB 28, 2020   |   8:27AM    WASHINGTON, DC
The disconnect between many in the Democratic Party and the majority of the country on the issue of abortion was on full display this week with Sen. Elizabeth Warren serving as a word picture for a party that seems unable to find common ground with anyone but Planned Parenthood.
In an unsurprising loss because 60 votes were needed, the Senate was unable on Tuesdayto put an end to the practice of infanticide when abortionists refuse to provide medical care to babies born during botched abortions or of painful late-term abortions committed on children in utero 5 months or later. Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) led the debate for the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, while Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) championed the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, both calling for these measures as the bare minimum of human decency for human beings.
In his floor speech, Sasse told his colleagues about the Born Alive measure, “This bill isn’t about abortion. I’m pro-life. I’m unapologetically pro-life, but this bill is not actually about anything that limits abortion. This bill doesn’t have anything to do with Roe v. Wade. This bill is about something else. What this bill does is try to secure basic rights, equal rights for babies that are born and are outside the womb.”
On her Twitter account on Tuesday morning, Senator Warren made it clear that it was “radical and restrictive” to put any limits on abortion. As she has unapologetically said, “I believe that abortion rights are human rights.
That’s not a position the public shares with the Democratic presidential candidates.
A Marist poll released last month found that 70 percent of Americans support restrictions on abortion and that 55 percent would ban abortion after 5 months of pregnancy. A poll by Students for Life of America found that only 7 percent of Millennials support the current Democratic Party Platform of abortion through all 9 months, for any reason at all and with taxpayer funding.
Click Like if you are pro-life to like the LifeNews Facebook page!
The Democratic National Committee’s platform is so extreme that no matter who becomes the party’s nominee, the Democratic candidate for President of the United States will support full taxpayer funding of abortion through a “Medicare for All” socialized healthcare system, ending the Hyde Amendment that limits federal funding of abortion, using taxpayer dollars for abortions worldwide, passing a no-limits standard of abortion into federal law (codifying Roe v. Wade), and possibly even packing the Supreme Courtwith new judges who will vote abortion first and often.
These positions play well with Planned Parenthood, the nation’s No. 1 abortion vendor, which is so popular with those running for the presidency that the candidates paid their glowing respects in a candidate forum and continue to discuss additional funding to an abortion practice that already gets more than $600 million a year from taxpayers.
Warren has even pledged to dress in a Planned Parenthood scarf to her inauguration, a fashion don’t for many voters.
And yet, despite the mad rush hours before to support unlimited abortion in all its forms and even infanticide of, as CNN calls it “a fetus that was born,” Warren felt the need to chastise former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg for allegedly telling an former employee to “kill it” when he learned of her pregnancy.
The senator went on to discuss an event of discrimination that she says happened to her when she was a pregnant school teacher, attempting to be a champion of women. But the schizophrenia of Warren’s exchanges – for and against abortion — illustrates the problem with the Democratic Party’s approach.
Rather than eliminating the suffering – problems with employment laws and enforcement, and lack of support for Title IX violations that our team at Students for Life sees often on college campuses, to name a few – the abortion mindset insists that we eliminate the potential sufferer by getting rid of the baby. Abortion as a sign of female empowerment and as the defining issue for women is ingrained into talking points, ignoring women’s need for economic equality, education, or accommodation when pregnant and parenting.
But the reality is that the day after a woman gets an abortion she will be just as poor, just as in need, just as deserving of help as she was the day before. “Kill it” should not be the message to women who wonder about their futures.
Pregnancy is not a disease cured by abortion as abortion does not elevate women, but rather often illustrates the lack of support for those most in need of it. This is why the radical push for abortion without limits misses the mark with the majority of voters and why Warren’s dizzying arguments about abortion this week clearly illustrate the pr oblem for a party that is putting the interests of the abortion industry ahead of women’s true needs and the desire of the American people.

Nancy Pelosi and Democrats Defeat Bill to Stop Infanticide, Care for Babies Born Alive After Abortions (Democrats have proven themselves truly Evil among those Men & Woman of Great Disrespect & Dishonor. They Destroy as well as Disrespect The Innocent Blood of Our UN-Born Children. Democrats Spit Upon The American Flag while selling out our country to the highest bidder.Our Nations Blood is upon your Hands.) We Cry Out, Never More. Never More.

 NATIONAL   STEVEN ERTELT   FEB 28, 2020   |   2:52PM    WASHINGTON, DC
Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats today defeated a motion on a bill that would stop infanticide and provide medical care and treatment for babies who are born alive after botched abortions.
Today Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives voted down a motion to recommit to H.R. 2339 which would have protected babies who survive abortions. The motion contained the text of H.R. 962, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. The vote in the House comes on the heels of Senate Democrats filibustering the Senate version of this legislation.
Had the motion prevailed, a House committee would have had a chance to vote on the Born Alive bill. Instead, with Democrats voting the motion down, this becomes the 81st time Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats have prevented members of Congress from voting on the important pro-life legislation,
Democrats voted 220-187 against the pro-life motion, with three Democrats Dan Lipinski (IL-03), Ben McAdams (UT-04), and Collin Peterson (MN-07) joining Republicans to support it.
One leading pro-life advocate told LifeNews.com she was upset that Democrats can’t even bother to allow a vote on a common sense bill to stop infanticide.
“This week congressional Democrats stood firmly behind the party’s presidential candidates in supporting abortion on-demand, up until the moment of birth, and even supporting infanticide,” said SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser. “Americans of all political stripes are disgusted by this extreme, inhumane position and we are confident that will be reflected at the ballot box this November. President Trump stands ready to sign the popular, compassionate Born-Alive legislation into law. It is national Democrats – from the party’s leading presidential contenders to Nancy Pelosi – who stand squarely in the way of protecting these innocent children from being left to die.
“We thank President Trump, Leader Kevin McCarthy, Whip Steve Scalise, Congresswoman Ann Wagner, and all our pro-life Republican allies in Congress for their dedication to getting this humane legislation enacted.”
Earlier this week, the Senate voted 56-41 against ending the filibuster and allow a debate and vote on the bill itself with Republicans supporting a vote on the anti-infanticide bill and Democrats opposing it. This is the third time Senate Democrats have blocked the bill to stop infanticide as 60 votes are needed to end the filibuster.
During the debate, Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska noted how pro-abortion Democrats refused to stand up and explain why they would block a vote to save babies from infanticide.
He said, “I urge my colleagues to picture a baby that’s already been born, that’s outside the womb gasping for air. That’s the only thing that today’s vote is actually about. We’re talking about babies that have already been born. Nothing in this bill touches abortion access.”
The Senate recently held a hearing on the Born Alive bill. In the hearing called, “The Infant Patient: Ensuring Appropriate Medical Care for Children Born Alive,” Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska made it clear why the bill is needed:
“This hearing is not about overturning Roe v. Wade. In fact, this hearing is not actually about limiting access to abortion at all. This hearing isn’t a debate about third-trimester, or second-trimester, or first-trimester abortion. This hearing is about making sure that every newborn baby has a fighting chance — whether she’s born in a labor and delivery ward or whether she’s born in an abortion clinic.” For once, he urged, can we not “immediately retreat into the fortified and familiar trenches our two parties have occupied for most of the past 47 years?”
Family Research Council staffer Patricia Mosley told senators: “There have been no cases involving prosecutions under the [2002] Born-Alive Infants Protection Act that we know of. Why? Because there is currently no federal criminal statute specifically prohibiting taking the lives of born-alive infants.”
If babies do survive, Mosley said it’s because of the compassion of others. But we cannot, she insisted, “rely on the extraordinary for these infants to have a chance at life. Instead, we should expect that ordinary care be given to anyone considered a full person under the law.”
To people like Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), that’s astounding. “I’m aware of no other circumstance in the law where we would willfully disregard the humanity of a human being.”
And the idea, Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said, “that it would somehow be debatable, what to do with that child… is a remarkable statement of just how extreme and radical the pro-abortion side of this debate has gotten.”
Leading pro-life groups were disgusted by the Democrats who voted to block the bill.
“These bills would have protected very developed, living unborn children who can feel pain and those babies who are born alive following an abortion who are often allowed to die from neglect,” said National Right to Life President Carol Tobias.
Tobias continued, “Tragically, pro-abortion Democrats in the Senate are beholden to pro-abortion groups. Shame on pro-abortion Democrats for not being willing to even protect living babies that survive abortion or to protect late-term babies who feel the excruciating pain of abortion. Their constituents will want to know why they are willing to allow these horrors to continue.”
Penny Nance of Concerned Women for America added: “Planned Parenthood and abortion extremists’ death grip have once again prevailed through the Democrat party. Today they voted to turn their backs to protect babies who feel pain or are born alive from a failed abortion. It is unconscionable that Democrats stand on the side of authoritarian regimes like China and North Korea who condone the killing of unborn children until birth and leave unwanted newborns to die. Unfortunately that is where our country’s laws stand today.”
Father Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests for Life, also commented in an email to LifeNews.com.
“You would think that those elected to public service would know the difference between serving the public and killing the public. With few exceptions, that is apparently not the case among Democrats in the U.S. Senate, as once again, a largely party-line cloture vote failed to advance two key pro-life bills,” he said. “The job of pro-life people now is to inform the voters on how their Senators voted on these two bills, and then to vote the abortion extremists, i.e. the Democrats, out of office.”
When it comes to infanticide, data reports from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) show the incidence of born-alive abortion survivors who are killed in the U.S. According to Congressional testimony:
Data that the CDC collects also confirms babies are born alive after attempted abortions.  Between the years 2003 and 2014 there were somewhere between 376 and 588 infant deaths under the medical code P96.4 which keeps track of babies born alive after a “termination of pregnancy.”
The CDC concluded that, of the 588 babies, 143 were “definitively” born alive after an attempted abortion and they lived from minutes to one or more days, with 48% of the babies living between one to four hours.  It also admitted that it’s possible the number is an underestimate.
We know it is an underestimate because these are just reported numbers from hospitals, not abortion facilities.  Kermit Gosnell is only one abortionist who was responsible for “hundreds of snippings” of born-alive babies, yet he did not report even one.  His numbers alone exceed the “definitive” numbers of the CDC.
Additionally, research by the American Center for Law and Justice estimated the number is much higher, at least 362 between 2001 and 2010.
Here’s more:
Our analysis is further supported by data from Canada that shows in the last reported ten years, “491 babies were left to die after they were born alive during abortions.”  A look at how these statistics are recorded by Canada’s official recording agency (also using ICD-10 code P96.4), explained here and here, further confirms the data recorded by the CDC.  In Britain it is reported that 50 babies are born alive as the result of botched abortions each year.  Additionally, an “estimated 44,000 abortion survivors” are living in the United States today.
State figures also show babies possibly killed in infanticides. In fact, a  report from Florida shows that at least six babies were born alive during abortions in that state in 2018. The report does not indicate what happened to them.
Moreover, a total of 19 states do not require any protection for babies born alive after botched abortions. Some states never have passed laws to protect abortion survivors, while at least one other, New York, recently repealed its law requiring medical care for infants who survive abortions.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *