You are not signed in as a Premium user; we rely on Premium users to support our news reporting. Sign in or Sign up today!
CLICK TO WATCH THE VIDEO
TRANSCRIPT
The World Health Organization is promoting international abortion on demand for any reason, at any time in pregnancy, regardless of circumstance. Church Militant's Paul Murano uncovers the international anti-life agenda of the United Nations' health care arm.
Rebecca Oas, director of research, C-Fam: "What the World Health Organization recently did was it updated its sort of technical guidance on what it calls 'safe abortion.'"
Claiming abortion is a crucial part of health care, the World Health Organization is crystal clear about where it stands on prenatal murder. The acting director for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research for the WHO released a document earlier this month entitled "Abortion Care Guideline."
The document overview states that "this guideline updates and replaces the recommendations in all previous WHO guidelines on abortion care." It then suggests all laws curtailing or regulating abortion should be scrapped because they only provide unjust obstacles to the killing of children.
Oas: "Whatever the World Health Organization might say about your laws constituting a barrier to abortion, they have no right to tell your government, on this, what your laws should be."
The document doesn't even mention compromise positions, like banning sex selection or post-viability abortions. All laws against abortion access, it insists, are dangerous for "women, girls — or other pregnant persons."
The document further attacks religious liberty by criticizing conscientious objection for physicians refusing to kill children.
The Luciferian Left, with its woke ideology, is in charge of international health care policies. And it has no mercy on the world's most vulnerable citizens.
The 210-page document gave much lip service to the dignity of women and girls but gave no hint of recognition for the humanity or dignity of the preborn child.
Finnish evangelical escapes prison for citing 'hate speech' from St. Paul
You are not signed in as a Premium user; we rely on Premium users to support our news reporting. Sign in or Sign up today!
HELSINKI, Finland (ChurchMilitant.com) - In a major victory for free speech, the Helsinki district court has cleared a Finnish lawmaker three years after she was charged with "hate speech" crimes for tweeting biblical verses proscribing homosexual acts.
Lutheran bishop Juhana Pohjola
"It is not for the district court to interpret biblical concepts," the court concluded in a unanimous ruling Wednesday, ordering the prosecution to pay over 60,000 euros in legal costs to the defendants and 496 euros in costs to the Luther Foundation of Finland.
Evangelical Lutheran and medical doctor Dr. Päivi Räsänen was charged with three counts of "incitement" against homosexuals, including tweeting a quote from St. Paul's letter to the Romans in response to the Helsinki LGBTQ+ Pride March in June 2019.
In Romans 1:24–27, the apostle Paul describes men and women exchanging "natural relations for those that are contrary to nature" and "receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error."
"Although the tweet may have offended the participants in the Pride event, it has not claimed that the participants in the event, for example, are inferior to others," the court ruled. Räsänen's tweet criticized the Lutheran Church for co-sponsoring the Pride parade.
The high-profile trial received international attention, particularly after the prosecutor general Ms. Raija Toiviainen attacked core Christian teachings and cross-examined Räsänen on her theology in court.
Attacking the phrase "love the sinner; hate the sin," Toiviainen quoted Old Testament Bible verses, alleging that the use of the word "sin" can be "harmful." The prosecution also argued that Räsänen's claim on radio that "God did not originally create man as a homosexual but as a heterosexual," was offensive.
I have been criminally charged for voicing my deeply held beliefs that are based on classical Christianity.GabTweet
The court, however, ruled that Räsänen did not exceed the limits of free speech or insult homosexuals as a group based on sexual orientation and that her words were not capable of arousing contempt, intolerance or hatred towards homosexuals; nor were they intended to degrade or insult.
"The ruling was what I expected. Not for a second did I believe that I had committed anything illegal in my writings and statements," Räsänen told Church Militant in a statement. "I have been criminally charged for voicing my deeply held beliefs that are based on classical Christianity."
Räsänen defends her deeply held Christian beliefs
The lawmaker emphasized the historic nature of the judgment, explaining that "the court has had to, for the first time, take a stand on whether it is legal or not to cite the Bible."
"I have felt joy about being able to speak about the gospel and the atonement of Jesus during these couple of years," she added, telling the press that she wouldn't hesitate to cite scriptural texts on homosexuality in the same way she had previously.
It is not for the district court to interpret biblical concepts.GabTweet
"What has worried me is that this process, which has lasted almost three years, has tended to narrow religious freedom and cause self-censorship," she lamented.
The prosecutor has warned she will appeal against the ruling, but Räsänen told media she is "prepared to defend freedom of speech and religion in all courts, even before the European Court of Human Rights."
Prosecutor general Raija Toiviainen
"One may disagree with Christian teaching. Some may even find it shocking. However, a criminal prosecution of high-profile Christians for sharing their beliefs shows that Europe's hate-speech laws have become a serious problem," barrister Lorcán Price, legal counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom International, commented.
"And this is impacting people whose views were once acceptable but are now deemed to be potentially 'hateful,'" Price, a member of the team defending Räsänen, lamented.
The lawmaker was also charged with "hate speech" for comments on a talk show on the Finnish Broadcasting System in December 2019. The show was titled "What Would Jesus Think About Homosexuals?"
The three charges against the lawmaker carry a total prison sentence of six years.
Charges were also dropped against the booklet's editor-in-chief, Rev. Dr. Juhana Pohjola, dean of the Evangelical Lutheran Mission diocese of Finland, who authorized the publication of the tract. Police interrogated Pohjola for five hours in February 2020.
Kerttu Tarjamo, secretary general for Finnish LGBT+ organization Seta, said it was important that "hate speech directed at LGBTIQA+ people" is dealt with in the legal system "even when it is displayed in a religious context or is motivated by religion."
"It is obvious that Räsänen's public opinions regarding gay people are deeply offensive to many persons belonging to sexual minorities," Tarjamo noted. "We hope that the matter will still be dealt with by the highest courts."
Räsänen has served as a Finnish member of Parliament since 1995. From 2004 to 2015, she was chair of the Christian Democrats; and from 2011 to 2015, she was the minister of the interior. During this time, she held responsibility for church affairs in Finland.
Should I dare say, St Paul was right two millennia ago about homosexuals and sodomy! And he is still right today. The LGBTQ mob in Finland did not get away with their lynching of Dr. Päivi Räsänen, I wonder who they will try to lynch next!
Too bad they got rid of his famous writing in Romans about homosexuality. Those “ wonderful” clerics and liturgical “ scholars” cried it was too hard a teaching. In reality I think the homosexuals and progressives wanted the section eliminated to push their homosexual agenda.
Posts
